Product Identification · Area Calculation · Packaging Logic · Sales · Accounting · Order Fulfillment
QR-Based Product Standardization for Tile & Ceramic Retail
Project positioning
This project combined two connected systems:
- a QR-based product identification and customer information standard for tile and ceramic products, and
- a sales/accounting workflow platform for tile and ceramic retailers.
The first part was designed so that an ordinary customer could scan a QR code attached to a tile/ceramic product and immediately understand the product's technical and packaging characteristics without depending on a salesperson to interpret every field.
The second part digitized the commercial workflow from customer request through order preparation and delivery.
A broader standardization initiative was also planned around the QR structure so that tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran could use a common product-information format, allowing end customers to read and compare product specifications in a consistent way across different shops.
The correct portfolio framing is therefore:
A domain-specific QR product-information standard combined with sales, accounting, and order-fulfillment automation for the tile and ceramic retail sector.
It should not be presented merely as:
“a QR code app”
or:
“a tile shop website.”
Classification
- Project Type: Product Information Standard + Sales Automation Platform
- Industry: Tile & Ceramic Retail / Building Materials
- Primary Domain: Product Identification and Retail Sales Automation
- Secondary Domains: QR Coding, Packaging Logic, Area Calculation, Inventory, Accounting, Order Fulfillment
- Core Innovation: Human-readable product standard encoded/linked through QR
- Target Users: Retailers, Sales Staff, End Customers
- Standardization Scope: Planned common use across tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran
- Portfolio Relevance: Very High
- Suggested CV Relevance: Tier A — Domain Modeling, Retail Automation, QR Product Data, Business Workflow
Website Card
Title:
Tile & Ceramic QR Product Intelligence & Sales Automation Platform
Subtitle:
QR Product Standard · Area Calculation · Packaging · Sales · Accounting
One-line Description:
Designed a QR-based product-information standard for tile and ceramic products, allowing customers to understand technical, packaging, and coverage information directly by scanning a code, and connected it to a sales/accounting workflow that digitized the process from customer order to delivery.
Categories:
- QR
- Product Information
- Tile & Ceramic
- Retail Automation
- Sales
- Accounting
- Order Management
- Packaging Logic
- Area Calculation
- Standardization
Concept Tags:QR Code · Product Master · Area Calculator · Carton Logic · Pallet Logic · Retail Sales · Order Fulfillment · Accounting · Tehran Retail Standard
Executive Summary
The tile and ceramic retail sector has a recurring usability problem:
A product is not defined only by its visual appearance.
The customer may need to understand:
- dimensions,
- product type,
- grade,
- product code,
- carton capacity,
- carton weight,
- pallet configuration,
- and the amount required for a specific installation area.
This information is often technical and difficult for an ordinary customer to interpret.
The project therefore introduced a QR-based product-information model.
Conceptually:
Physical Tile / Ceramic Product
↓
QR Code
↓
Structured Product Information
↓
Customer Understands the Product
↓
Area / Quantity Calculation
↓
Sales / Order Process
Part A — QR Product Intelligence
The first subsystem focused on the product itself.
Each product was associated with a QR code that could expose or encode structured information about the product.
The purpose was to make technical product information understandable to ordinary buyers.
Product Information Model
A tile/ceramic product could include information such as:
Product
├── Company / Manufacturer
├── Product Name
├── Product Type
├── Width
├── Height
├── Product Code
├── Grade
├── Design
├── Color
├── Pieces / Coverage per Carton
├── Carton Weight
├── Cartons per Pallet
└── Calculation Data
Example From the Historical Interface
The provided mobile screenshot visibly shows fields such as:
- Company
- Type
- Size
- Design
- Color
with a sample size:
80 × 80
and a product type shown as:
Super Polish
This demonstrates that the mobile-facing information model was structured around product attributes rather than generic free text.
QR as the Physical-to-Digital Bridge
The QR code acted as the bridge between the physical product and its digital description.
Physical Product
↓
QR Code
↓
Digital Product Record
This made the product itself the entry point into the digital system.
Customer-Facing Objective
The design goal was not only to help store employees.
It was also intended to make the product understandable to ordinary customers.
The customer could scan the QR code and view the data directly.
This reduced dependence on:
- handwritten labels,
- incomplete verbal explanations,
- inconsistent terminology,
- seller-specific explanations.
Standardization Goal
A major strategic goal of the project was to create a common product-information structure that could be used by tile and ceramic retailers across Tehran.
The intended model was:
Retailer A
Retailer B
Retailer C
Retailer D
↓
Same QR Information Structure
↓
Customer Sees the Same Type of Data Everywhere
Why Standardization Matters
Without a shared structure:
Shop A → describes size one way
Shop B → describes packaging differently
Shop C → omits grade
Shop D → uses different terminology
With a shared structure:
Product
→ same core fields
→ same customer expectations
→ easier comparison
This makes the project closer to a retail information standard than a simple app.
Historical Claim Boundary
The confirmed project statement is:
A common QR-based information structure was created, and the plan was for tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran to use it so customers could understand product specifications consistently.
Do not overstate this as:
“All tile retailers in Tehran adopted the standard”
unless full adoption can later be documented.
QR Payload Characteristics
The historical scanner screenshot shows product information readable after scanning the code.
The visible content includes:
- size,
- product identifier/code,
- product type,
- grade,
- carton-related information,
- pallet-related information,
- and a sample calculation.
This indicates that the QR representation was designed as a meaningful product-information payload rather than only a decorative code.
QR Payload Concept
Conceptually:
QR Payload
├── Product Identity
├── Technical Characteristics
├── Packaging Characteristics
└── Calculation Guidance
Product Identity
Typical identity fields:
Company
Product Code
Product Name / Type
Design
Color
Product Dimensions
For tiles and ceramics, dimensions are essential.
Example:
80 × 80 cm
Dimensions directly affect:
- coverage,
- packaging,
- required quantity,
- installation calculations.
Product Grade
The grade field is important because different quality grades may exist for the same nominal product family.
The QR standard therefore made grade visible as a structured field.
Packaging Intelligence
The project did not stop at product appearance.
It also described the packaging/logistics behavior of the product.
Important fields included:
- pieces per carton,
- square-meter coverage per carton,
- carton weight,
- cartons per pallet.
Carton Model
Conceptually:
Carton
├── Product
├── Pieces
├── Coverage
└── Weight
Pallet Model
Conceptually:
Pallet
├── Cartons
├── Total Coverage
└── Total Weight
Why Packaging Data Matters
For the retailer:
- inventory,
- warehousing,
- delivery,
- transport planning.
For the customer:
- how many cartons to buy,
- how many pallets may be needed,
- approximate delivery scale.
Area Calculation Engine
One of the strongest features of the project was the domain-specific calculation engine.
The customer could provide the required installation area.
The system then calculated the required amount of product based on product dimensions and packaging rules.
Calculation Flow
Target Area
↓
Tile Coverage
↓
Required Tile Quantity
↓
Required Cartons
↓
Required Pallets
↓
Remaining / Partial Pallet
Example Logic
For example:
Required Area = 1000 m²
The system could determine:
How many tiles?
How many cartons?
How many full pallets?
How many additional cartons?
The scanner screenshot itself shows a worked example of this style of calculation.
Coverage Calculation
Conceptually:
Tile Area = Width × Height
Then:
Required Tiles = Target Area / Tile Area
After rounding to packaging constraints:
Required Cartons = ceil(Required Tiles / PiecesPerCarton)
Then:
Required Pallets = Required Cartons / CartonsPerPallet
The actual historical formula may also incorporate product-specific packaging rules.
Packaging-Aware Rounding
Retail products cannot usually be sold as arbitrary fractional packaging units.
Therefore the system needs to translate continuous area into discrete packaging.
Example:
Target Area
→ 781.25 theoretical cartons
→ 782 actual cartons
This type of rounding is a genuine business rule.
Waste / Safety Margin
The current project description confirms area-based calculation.
If a configurable installation waste margin existed historically, it should be documented separately.
A modern V2 could support:
5%
7%
10%
custom waste factor
depending on installation pattern.
Part B — Sales & Accounting Automation
The second subsystem addressed the retailer's operational workflow.
The objective was to digitize the process from customer request to product delivery.
Commercial Workflow
Conceptually:
Customer Requirement
↓
Product Selection
↓
Area Calculation
↓
Required Quantity
↓
Quotation
↓
Order
↓
Accounting
↓
Warehouse / Preparation
↓
Delivery
Order Lifecycle
The order becomes the central business object.
Order
├── Customer
├── Product
├── Required Area
├── Calculated Quantity
├── Cartons
├── Pallets
├── Price
├── Payment
├── Delivery Status
└── History
Customer Request
The process begins with the customer's actual need.
The system translates:
"I need tiles for X m²"
into:
Product + Quantity + Packaging + Commercial Order
Product Selection
Because products already had structured master data, the sales workflow could reuse:
- dimensions,
- packaging,
- grade,
- identifiers.
This avoids retyping product information during every sale.
Quotation
Once quantity is calculated, the system can generate the commercial basis for a quotation.
Conceptually:
Product
×
Required Quantity
×
Price
=
Quotation
Accounting
The second subsystem included accounting functionality for tile and ceramic stores.
The goal was to connect sales transactions to financial records rather than leaving accounting as a separate manual process.
Accounting Scope
A retail accounting workflow can include:
- customer balance,
- order amount,
- payment,
- outstanding amount,
- invoice,
- transaction history.
The exact historical screens should only be described where preserved.
Sales to Delivery
The system aimed to digitize the full commercial lifecycle:
Order Created
↓
Confirmed
↓
Financial Processing
↓
Prepared
↓
Delivered
Warehouse Interaction
Even if the historical inventory implementation details are incomplete, the product model naturally connects to inventory.
Each order consumes:
Cartons
and potentially:
Pallets
from available stock.
Product Master Data
The entire system depends on reliable product master data.
A conceptual modern model:
products
├── id
├── manufacturer_id
├── code
├── name
├── type
├── width
├── height
├── grade
├── design
├── color
├── pieces_per_carton
├── coverage_per_carton
├── carton_weight
└── cartons_per_pallet
QR Identity
Each product can be associated with:
product_qr
├── product_id
├── payload
├── version
└── active
QR Versioning
Because standards evolve, a modern implementation should include versioning.
Example:
QR Standard v1
QR Standard v2
This prevents future field changes from breaking old codes.
Canonical Product Schema
A shared retailer standard should define a canonical field structure.
Example:
manufacturer
product_code
product_type
dimensions
grade
design
color
carton_capacity
carton_weight
pallet_capacity
Interoperability
If many retailers use the same standard, the QR data should be independent of one specific shop.
This allows:
Manufacturer / Distributor
↓
Canonical QR Data
↓
Any Compatible Retailer
↓
Same Customer Interpretation
QR Data vs Retailer Data
A robust modern design should distinguish:
Product Standard Data
from:
Retailer-Specific Data
For example:
Standard Product Data
- size,
- grade,
- packaging,
- product code.
Retailer-Specific Data
- price,
- stock,
- discount,
- delivery date.
This separation improves reuse.
Public Customer View
The customer-facing interface should emphasize understandable information.
Example:
Company
Type
Size
Design
Color
Grade
Packaging
Coverage
rather than exposing internal database fields.
Retailer View
Retail employees may need more:
Stock
Purchase Cost
Selling Price
Supplier
Warehouse Location
Order History
Role Separation
Modern system roles could include:
Customer
Sales
Warehouse
Accounting
Manager
Administrator
Historical role names should be documented only if preserved.
Customer Role
Can:
- scan QR,
- view product information,
- calculate required quantity.
Sales Role
Can:
- create customer order,
- calculate quantity,
- prepare quotation,
- check availability.
Warehouse Role
Can:
- prepare goods,
- confirm carton/pallet quantities,
- mark dispatch.
Accounting Role
Can:
- register payments,
- confirm financial status,
- issue accounting records.
Management Role
Can:
- review sales,
- review stock,
- review financial reports,
- configure product rules.
Inventory Model
For tile and ceramic retail, inventory may be represented at carton level.
Conceptually:
Stock
├── Product
├── Cartons Available
├── Pallets Available
└── Reserved Quantity
Reservation
When an order is confirmed:
Available Stock
↓
Reserve Required Cartons
↓
Prevent Double-Selling
A modern V2 should implement this transactionally.
Concurrency
If two sales employees sell the same product at the same time, the system should prevent inventory conflicts.
Use:
- database transactions,
- row locking,
- reservation status.
Pricing
A product can have:
- base price,
- retailer price,
- discount,
- customer-specific price.
The historical pricing rules should be documented only where evidence exists.
Delivery Planning
Pallet calculations can support delivery planning.
Example:
Order
→ 782 Cartons
→ 20 Full Pallets
→ 2 Extra Cartons
This is operationally useful for transport.
Weight Calculation
Because carton weight is known:
Total Shipment Weight
=
Required Cartons × Carton Weight
This can support:
- vehicle planning,
- loading,
- delivery estimation.
Logistics Value
The product standard therefore supports more than customer information.
It can also feed:
Sales
Inventory
Warehouse
Transport
QR Scanning Experience
The mobile screenshots show a dedicated product-information experience after scanning.
This demonstrates a simple and powerful interaction:
Scan
→ Understand
→ Calculate
Why This Matters for End Customers
Construction-material products are often difficult to compare.
A shared standard helps the customer answer:
- What exactly is this product?
- What size is it?
- What grade is it?
- How much area does one carton cover?
- How many cartons do I need?
- How many pallets will that be?
without requiring technical expertise.
Retail Transparency
The standard also improves retail transparency.
A customer can compare products using the same categories instead of relying on inconsistent descriptions.
Data Quality
A shared QR standard is only useful if product data is consistent.
A modern system should validate:
- dimensions,
- units,
- product code,
- grade,
- carton coverage,
- weight,
- pallet quantity.
Unit Normalization
Important units may include:
cm
m²
kg
piece
carton
pallet
A canonical system should store units explicitly.
Validation Example
If:
80 × 80 cm
then tile area is:
0.64 m²
If a carton contains N pieces:
coverage_per_carton = N × 0.64
The system can validate whether stored coverage is consistent.
Calculation Engine Architecture
A modern implementation should isolate calculation rules from controllers/UI.
Example:
CoverageCalculationService
PackagingCalculationService
PalletCalculationService
Coverage Service
Input:
Product
Target Area
Output:
Required Pieces
Required Cartons
Required Pallets
Remainder
Calculation Result Object
CalculationResult
├── target_area
├── tile_area
├── pieces_required
├── cartons_required
├── full_pallets
└── extra_cartons
Rules Engine Potential
Different products may have different:
- carton capacities,
- pallet capacities,
- packaging rules.
The system should therefore treat them as data-driven rules rather than hard-coded assumptions.
QR Generation
A modern workflow could be:
Product Created
↓
Validated
↓
QR Payload Generated
↓
QR Image Generated
↓
Printed / Attached
Label Printing
The physical deployment required QR codes to be printed and attached to products or packaging.
This is an important physical-digital integration point.
Printing Workflow
Product Master
↓
QR Generator
↓
Label Template
↓
Print
↓
Attach to Product / Package
Standard Label Layout
A common retailer standard can define:
- QR placement,
- human-readable product code,
- size,
- grade.
This helps even when scanning is unavailable.
Offline / Generic Scanner Readability
The historical scanner screenshot suggests that product information was designed to remain interpretable through a QR scanning workflow.
A robust standard should avoid making the QR useful only through one proprietary app.
Public Standard Philosophy
The strongest conceptual interpretation is:
The QR code should describe the product, not the retailer.
Retailer-specific functions can be layered on top.
This allows the standard to scale across many stores.
Multi-Retailer Architecture
A modern common platform could support:
Product Standard
↓
Retailer A
Retailer B
Retailer C
while each retailer maintains its own:
- prices,
- stock,
- orders,
- accounting.
Multi-Tenant V2
A modern implementation could be multi-tenant.
Tenant
├── Users
├── Stores
├── Prices
├── Inventory
├── Customers
└── Orders
The shared product master could be centralized.
Shared Master + Retailer Overlay
Shared Product Master
+
Retailer-Specific Overlay
↓
Final Retail View
This is a strong modernization model.
Manufacturer Integration
A future version could allow manufacturers to maintain the canonical product data.
Retailers then consume it.
Manufacturer
↓
Product Master
↓
Retailers
This reduces inconsistent product descriptions.
Barcode / QR Identifier Strategy
A robust system should use stable unique identifiers.
Avoid encoding mutable data such as current price directly into permanent QR codes.
Use immutable product identity plus controlled data retrieval where appropriate.
Historical vs Modern QR Strategy
The historical project successfully exposed structured product information via QR.
A modern V2 could use:
QR = Stable Product Identifier
and retrieve current data from the platform.
This makes updates easier.
Security
Public QR scanning should expose only public product information.
Internal data such as:
- purchase cost,
- accounting data,
- internal stock details
should remain authenticated.
Public / Internal Boundary
Public QR View
├── Product Specs
├── Packaging
└── Calculator
Internal System
├── Stock
├── Pricing Rules
├── Accounting
└── Orders
Accounting Integration
The commercial subsystem connects operational sales to financial records.
A clean modern flow:
Order
↓
Invoice
↓
Payment
↓
Accounting Transaction
Customer Balance
If credit sales are supported, the system can maintain:
Customer
├── Invoices
├── Payments
└── Balance
Do not claim historical credit-sales logic unless separately documented.
Order Status
A modern V2 could use statuses such as:
Draft
Quoted
Confirmed
Paid / Partially Paid
Prepared
Dispatched
Delivered
Cancelled
These are modernization examples.
Delivery Proof
A future version could record:
- delivery date,
- receiver,
- signature,
- shipment reference.
Reporting
Useful reports include:
Sales by Product
Sales by Size
Sales by Brand
Cartons Sold
Pallets Shipped
Inventory Remaining
Retail Analytics
Because product attributes are structured, the system can answer questions such as:
Which sizes sell most?
Which grades sell most?
Which manufacturers sell most?
Which products create the largest pallet volume?
Customer Analytics
If privacy rules allow, retailers can analyze:
- recurring customers,
- average order area,
- order frequency.
Standard Adoption Strategy
For a multi-retailer standard, adoption should be gradual.
Conceptually:
Pilot Retailer
↓
Validate Fields
↓
Validate Customer Understanding
↓
More Retailers
↓
Common Standard
The historical project had the stated goal of broader Tehran retail use.
Governance of the Standard
A shared standard needs rules for:
- field definitions,
- versioning,
- mandatory fields,
- optional fields,
- backward compatibility.
Example Mandatory Fields
Product Code
Manufacturer
Dimensions
Type
Grade
Carton Coverage
Carton Weight
Cartons per Pallet
Optional Fields
Design
Color
Marketing Name
Additional Notes
Standard Versioning Example
TCQR-1.0
TCQR-1.1
TCQR-2.0
This is a suggested modern governance model.
Backward Compatibility
Old printed QR codes may remain in stores for years.
Therefore the decoder should understand older schema versions.
Data Integrity
A QR standard should define:
- required data types,
- numeric precision,
- unit conventions,
- identifier uniqueness.
Example Validation Rules
width > 0
height > 0
carton_weight > 0
cartons_per_pallet > 0
product_code unique
Historical Evidence Strategy
The currently available images provide strong evidence for:
- mobile product detail,
- mobile inquiry/calculation form,
- QR scan output with technical and packaging information.
Evidence Caption 1 — Product Detail
Customer-facing mobile product detail showing structured information such as company, type, size, design, and color.
Evidence Caption 2 — Inquiry / Calculation
Mobile inquiry interface where a product code and requested area can be submitted for quantity calculation.
Evidence Caption 3 — QR Payload
Historical QR scan showing structured tile/ceramic product specifications, packaging information, and an area-based calculation example.
Historical vs Modern Boundary
Confirmed Historical Capabilities / Facts
- QR codes were printed and attached to tile/ceramic products.
- Customers could scan them.
- Product information included:
- identity/specifications,
- dimensions,
- type,
- product code,
- grade,
- carton capacity,
- carton weight,
- pallet placement/capacity.
- An area-based calculation was provided.
- A worked calculation example was included.
- A second subsystem digitized tile/ceramic store sales and accounting.
- The commercial flow covered customer order through delivery.
- A common QR information structure was created.
- The intended rollout was broader use among tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran so ordinary customers could understand specifications consistently.
Modern V2 Recommendations
- QR schema versioning,
- multi-tenant retailers,
- manufacturer-owned product master,
- API-based product lookup,
- strict unit normalization,
- inventory reservation,
- transactional accounting,
- modern mobile/web UI,
- QR identifier instead of mutable embedded data.
What Not to Overclaim
Do not claim:
- universal adoption by all Tehran retailers unless documented,
- current mandatory industry-standard status,
- national adoption,
- specific accounting features not preserved in evidence,
- manufacturer integration unless it existed historically.
My Role
A precise portfolio description:
I designed a QR-based product-information model for tile and ceramic products, including technical specifications, packaging data, and area-based quantity calculations, with the goal of creating a consistent customer-facing standard for retailers in Tehran. I also developed a connected sales/accounting workflow that digitized the process from customer order to delivery.
Engineering Highlights
- Connected physical products to structured digital data via QR.
- Designed a domain-specific product schema.
- Modeled dimensions, grades, cartons, weights, and pallets.
- Implemented area-to-quantity calculation logic.
- Translated continuous area requirements into discrete packaging quantities.
- Designed a customer-facing mobile information flow.
- Connected product data to sales operations.
- Digitized order-to-delivery workflow.
- Added accounting-oriented retail processing.
- Created a reusable product-information standard intended for multi-retailer use.
Business Analysis Highlights
The project demonstrates:
INDUSTRY KNOWLEDGE
→ PRODUCT STANDARD
→ CUSTOMER UX
→ CALCULATION RULES
→ SALES WORKFLOW
This is more than application development.
It is domain modeling.
Standardization Highlights
The intended common structure solved a communication problem.
Before:
Each Shop
→ different terminology
→ different explanation
→ inconsistent customer understanding
After:
Common QR Structure
→ consistent product fields
→ easier customer understanding
→ easier comparison
Career Evidence
This project demonstrates:
- QR Product Systems
- Domain Modeling
- Product Master Data
- Area / Quantity Calculation
- Packaging Logic
- Carton / Pallet Modeling
- Retail Sales Automation
- Accounting Workflow
- Order Fulfillment
- Physical-to-Digital Integration
- Industry Standardization
- Customer-Facing UX
CV Relevance
Tier A — Domain Product Engineering
The project's value comes from combining:
PHYSICAL PRODUCT
+
DIGITAL STANDARD
+
CALCULATION ENGINE
+
RETAIL WORKFLOW
Interview Story
Situation
Tile and ceramic products contain technical and packaging information that ordinary customers often find difficult to interpret consistently across different retailers.
At the same time, sales workflows in tile/ceramic shops could involve separate manual steps from customer request through accounting and delivery.
Task
The project needed to create a standard product-information model that customers could understand directly and also connect product information to the retailer's sales process.
Action
I designed a QR-based product-information structure covering product identity, dimensions, type, grade, carton information, weight, and pallet configuration.
I also implemented area-based calculation logic so the customer could enter the required installation area and receive calculated quantities in tiles/cartons/pallets.
A second subsystem digitized the commercial workflow from customer order through accounting and delivery.
The QR information model was intended to become a common format used across tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran.
Result
The project created a direct connection between:
Physical Product
→ Customer Information
→ Quantity Calculation
→ Sales
→ Fulfillment
and established a reusable foundation for standardized product communication across retailers.
Suggested Website Full Description
Overview
The Tile & Ceramic QR Product Intelligence & Sales Automation Platform combined a customer-facing product-information standard with a retailer operations system.
QR codes attached to physical products allowed customers to access technical and packaging information directly.
Product Standard
The QR model included structured fields such as:
- company/manufacturer,
- product type,
- dimensions,
- product code,
- grade,
- carton capacity,
- carton weight,
- pallet configuration.
The objective was to make product specifications understandable and comparable for ordinary customers.
Coverage Calculator
Customers could enter the target installation area.
The system translated this into required product quantities and packaging units.
Retail Standardization
The product-information model was created with broader standardization in mind.
The planned model was for tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran to use the same core information structure.
Sales & Accounting
The second subsystem digitized the store workflow from customer order to final delivery.
Short Website Card Copy
Tile & Ceramic QR Product Intelligence & Sales Automation
Designed a QR-based product-information standard for tile and ceramic retail, including dimensions, grade, carton/pallet logic, and area-based quantity calculation, then connected it to a digital sales/accounting workflow from customer order to delivery.
Alternative One-Liners
QR-oriented
Built a QR-based tile and ceramic product standard that exposed technical, packaging, and quantity-calculation data directly to customers.
Domain-oriented
Modeled tile/ceramic dimensions, grades, cartons, pallet capacity, weight, and area calculations as a reusable digital product standard.
Retail-oriented
Connected QR product intelligence to a full retail sales workflow covering customer order, accounting, preparation, and delivery.
Standardization-oriented
Designed a common QR product-information model intended for use across tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran.
Suggested Website Slug
/projects/tile-ceramic-qr-sales-platform
Alternative:
/projects/qr-tile-product-standard
Cover Direction
Title
Tile & Ceramic QR Product Platform
Subtitle
QR Standard · Area Calculation · Sales Automation
Supporting Line
Product Data · Cartons · Pallets · Accounting · Delivery
Visual Direction
A premium square technical cover should show:
- ceramic/tile samples,
- QR code,
- mobile scan,
- dimension grid,
- carton icon,
- pallet icon,
- calculator,
- order workflow.
Primary visual story:
SCAN
→ UNDERSTAND
→ CALCULATE
→ ORDER
→ DELIVER
Avoid making it look like:
- a generic QR generator,
- an online tile catalog,
- a simple calculator.
The core message should be:
standardized product intelligence connected to real retail operations.
Relationship to Other Portfolio Projects
This project fits well beside projects that combine:
- physical operations,
- identifiers,
- business rules,
- workflow automation.
It is especially valuable because it demonstrates a bridge between the physical retail world and structured software systems.
Modern V2 Architecture
A modern V2 could use:
Frontend
↓
Laravel API
↓
Product Master
├── QR Standard
├── Calculation Engine
├── Pricing
├── Inventory
└── Orders
↓
PostgreSQL
For multiple retailers:
Shared Product Master
+
Multi-Tenant Retail Layer
Suggested Modules
Products
Manufacturers
QR
Calculation
Retailers
Pricing
Inventory
Customers
Orders
Accounting
Delivery
Reporting
Product Module
Owns:
- technical specs,
- dimensions,
- grade,
- packaging.
QR Module
Owns:
- QR generation,
- schema version,
- public product representation.
Calculator Module
Owns:
- area calculation,
- carton rounding,
- pallet calculation.
Retail Module
Owns:
- store-specific pricing,
- stock,
- customers.
Sales Module
Owns:
- quotation,
- order,
- payment state.
Delivery Module
Owns:
- preparation,
- shipment,
- final delivery.
Testing Strategy
Product Validation
dimensions valid
coverage valid
packaging valid
Calculator Tests
area → pieces
pieces → cartons
cartons → pallets
QR Tests
encode
scan
decode
schema validation
Order Tests
calculate
reserve
sell
deliver
Example Test
Given:
Tile size = 80 × 80 cm
Carton capacity = N tiles
Pallet capacity = M cartons
When:
Customer requests 1000 m²
Then:
System calculates:
- required tiles
- required cartons
- full pallets
- additional cartons
Data Integrity Principle
The product calculation must always use the same product master that drives the QR information.
This prevents:
QR says one thing
Sales system calculates another
Single Source of Truth
Preferred architecture:
Product Master
↓
QR
Calculator
Sales
Inventory
All modules consume the same master data.
Final Portfolio Statement
The strongest way to describe this project is not:
“I built a QR scanner for tiles.”
It is:
I designed a standardized QR-based product-information model for tile and ceramic retail, including technical specifications, packaging intelligence, and area-to-carton/pallet calculations, and connected it to a digital sales/accounting workflow from customer order through delivery.
The project demonstrates how a physical product can become a structured digital object and then drive the entire commercial workflow:
PHYSICAL PRODUCT
→ QR
→ STRUCTURED DATA
→ CUSTOMER UNDERSTANDING
→ QUANTITY CALCULATION
→ ORDER
→ ACCOUNTING
→ DELIVERY