Soroush Neyestani

Software Engineer

Application Architect

Enterprise Application Developer

Technical Author & Educator

Tile & Ceramic QR Product Intelligence & Sales Automation Platform

Product Identification · Area Calculation · Packaging Logic · Sales · Accounting · Order Fulfillment

QR-Based Product Standardization for Tile & Ceramic Retail

Project positioning

This project combined two connected systems:

  1. a QR-based product identification and customer information standard for tile and ceramic products, and
  2. a sales/accounting workflow platform for tile and ceramic retailers.

The first part was designed so that an ordinary customer could scan a QR code attached to a tile/ceramic product and immediately understand the product's technical and packaging characteristics without depending on a salesperson to interpret every field.

The second part digitized the commercial workflow from customer request through order preparation and delivery.

A broader standardization initiative was also planned around the QR structure so that tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran could use a common product-information format, allowing end customers to read and compare product specifications in a consistent way across different shops.

The correct portfolio framing is therefore:

A domain-specific QR product-information standard combined with sales, accounting, and order-fulfillment automation for the tile and ceramic retail sector.

It should not be presented merely as:

“a QR code app”

or:

“a tile shop website.”


Classification

  • Project Type: Product Information Standard + Sales Automation Platform
  • Industry: Tile & Ceramic Retail / Building Materials
  • Primary Domain: Product Identification and Retail Sales Automation
  • Secondary Domains: QR Coding, Packaging Logic, Area Calculation, Inventory, Accounting, Order Fulfillment
  • Core Innovation: Human-readable product standard encoded/linked through QR
  • Target Users: Retailers, Sales Staff, End Customers
  • Standardization Scope: Planned common use across tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran
  • Portfolio Relevance: Very High
  • Suggested CV Relevance: Tier A — Domain Modeling, Retail Automation, QR Product Data, Business Workflow

Website Card

Title:
Tile & Ceramic QR Product Intelligence & Sales Automation Platform

Subtitle:
QR Product Standard · Area Calculation · Packaging · Sales · Accounting

One-line Description:
Designed a QR-based product-information standard for tile and ceramic products, allowing customers to understand technical, packaging, and coverage information directly by scanning a code, and connected it to a sales/accounting workflow that digitized the process from customer order to delivery.

Categories:

  • QR
  • Product Information
  • Tile & Ceramic
  • Retail Automation
  • Sales
  • Accounting
  • Order Management
  • Packaging Logic
  • Area Calculation
  • Standardization

Concept Tags:
QR Code · Product Master · Area Calculator · Carton Logic · Pallet Logic · Retail Sales · Order Fulfillment · Accounting · Tehran Retail Standard


Executive Summary

The tile and ceramic retail sector has a recurring usability problem:

A product is not defined only by its visual appearance.

The customer may need to understand:

  • dimensions,
  • product type,
  • grade,
  • product code,
  • carton capacity,
  • carton weight,
  • pallet configuration,
  • and the amount required for a specific installation area.

This information is often technical and difficult for an ordinary customer to interpret.

The project therefore introduced a QR-based product-information model.

Conceptually:

Physical Tile / Ceramic Product
              ↓
            QR Code
              ↓
   Structured Product Information
              ↓
 Customer Understands the Product
              ↓
 Area / Quantity Calculation
              ↓
      Sales / Order Process

Part A — QR Product Intelligence

The first subsystem focused on the product itself.

Each product was associated with a QR code that could expose or encode structured information about the product.

The purpose was to make technical product information understandable to ordinary buyers.


Product Information Model

A tile/ceramic product could include information such as:

Product
├── Company / Manufacturer
├── Product Name
├── Product Type
├── Width
├── Height
├── Product Code
├── Grade
├── Design
├── Color
├── Pieces / Coverage per Carton
├── Carton Weight
├── Cartons per Pallet
└── Calculation Data

Example From the Historical Interface

The provided mobile screenshot visibly shows fields such as:

  • Company
  • Type
  • Size
  • Design
  • Color

with a sample size:

80 × 80

and a product type shown as:

Super Polish

This demonstrates that the mobile-facing information model was structured around product attributes rather than generic free text.


QR as the Physical-to-Digital Bridge

The QR code acted as the bridge between the physical product and its digital description.

Physical Product
      ↓
    QR Code
      ↓
Digital Product Record

This made the product itself the entry point into the digital system.


Customer-Facing Objective

The design goal was not only to help store employees.

It was also intended to make the product understandable to ordinary customers.

The customer could scan the QR code and view the data directly.

This reduced dependence on:

  • handwritten labels,
  • incomplete verbal explanations,
  • inconsistent terminology,
  • seller-specific explanations.

Standardization Goal

A major strategic goal of the project was to create a common product-information structure that could be used by tile and ceramic retailers across Tehran.

The intended model was:

Retailer A
Retailer B
Retailer C
Retailer D
    ↓
Same QR Information Structure
    ↓
Customer Sees the Same Type of Data Everywhere

Why Standardization Matters

Without a shared structure:

Shop A → describes size one way
Shop B → describes packaging differently
Shop C → omits grade
Shop D → uses different terminology

With a shared structure:

Product
→ same core fields
→ same customer expectations
→ easier comparison

This makes the project closer to a retail information standard than a simple app.


Historical Claim Boundary

The confirmed project statement is:

A common QR-based information structure was created, and the plan was for tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran to use it so customers could understand product specifications consistently.

Do not overstate this as:

“All tile retailers in Tehran adopted the standard”

unless full adoption can later be documented.


QR Payload Characteristics

The historical scanner screenshot shows product information readable after scanning the code.

The visible content includes:

  • size,
  • product identifier/code,
  • product type,
  • grade,
  • carton-related information,
  • pallet-related information,
  • and a sample calculation.

This indicates that the QR representation was designed as a meaningful product-information payload rather than only a decorative code.


QR Payload Concept

Conceptually:

QR Payload
├── Product Identity
├── Technical Characteristics
├── Packaging Characteristics
└── Calculation Guidance

Product Identity

Typical identity fields:

Company
Product Code
Product Name / Type
Design
Color

Product Dimensions

For tiles and ceramics, dimensions are essential.

Example:

80 × 80 cm

Dimensions directly affect:

  • coverage,
  • packaging,
  • required quantity,
  • installation calculations.

Product Grade

The grade field is important because different quality grades may exist for the same nominal product family.

The QR standard therefore made grade visible as a structured field.


Packaging Intelligence

The project did not stop at product appearance.

It also described the packaging/logistics behavior of the product.

Important fields included:

  • pieces per carton,
  • square-meter coverage per carton,
  • carton weight,
  • cartons per pallet.

Carton Model

Conceptually:

Carton
├── Product
├── Pieces
├── Coverage
└── Weight

Pallet Model

Conceptually:

Pallet
├── Cartons
├── Total Coverage
└── Total Weight

Why Packaging Data Matters

For the retailer:

  • inventory,
  • warehousing,
  • delivery,
  • transport planning.

For the customer:

  • how many cartons to buy,
  • how many pallets may be needed,
  • approximate delivery scale.

Area Calculation Engine

One of the strongest features of the project was the domain-specific calculation engine.

The customer could provide the required installation area.

The system then calculated the required amount of product based on product dimensions and packaging rules.


Calculation Flow

Target Area
    ↓
Tile Coverage
    ↓
Required Tile Quantity
    ↓
Required Cartons
    ↓
Required Pallets
    ↓
Remaining / Partial Pallet

Example Logic

For example:

Required Area = 1000 m²

The system could determine:

How many tiles?
How many cartons?
How many full pallets?
How many additional cartons?

The scanner screenshot itself shows a worked example of this style of calculation.


Coverage Calculation

Conceptually:

Tile Area = Width × Height

Then:

Required Tiles = Target Area / Tile Area

After rounding to packaging constraints:

Required Cartons = ceil(Required Tiles / PiecesPerCarton)

Then:

Required Pallets = Required Cartons / CartonsPerPallet

The actual historical formula may also incorporate product-specific packaging rules.


Packaging-Aware Rounding

Retail products cannot usually be sold as arbitrary fractional packaging units.

Therefore the system needs to translate continuous area into discrete packaging.

Example:

Target Area
→ 781.25 theoretical cartons
→ 782 actual cartons

This type of rounding is a genuine business rule.


Waste / Safety Margin

The current project description confirms area-based calculation.

If a configurable installation waste margin existed historically, it should be documented separately.

A modern V2 could support:

5%
7%
10%
custom waste factor

depending on installation pattern.


Part B — Sales & Accounting Automation

The second subsystem addressed the retailer's operational workflow.

The objective was to digitize the process from customer request to product delivery.


Commercial Workflow

Conceptually:

Customer Requirement
        ↓
Product Selection
        ↓
Area Calculation
        ↓
Required Quantity
        ↓
Quotation
        ↓
Order
        ↓
Accounting
        ↓
Warehouse / Preparation
        ↓
Delivery

Order Lifecycle

The order becomes the central business object.

Order
├── Customer
├── Product
├── Required Area
├── Calculated Quantity
├── Cartons
├── Pallets
├── Price
├── Payment
├── Delivery Status
└── History

Customer Request

The process begins with the customer's actual need.

The system translates:

"I need tiles for X m²"

into:

Product + Quantity + Packaging + Commercial Order

Product Selection

Because products already had structured master data, the sales workflow could reuse:

  • dimensions,
  • packaging,
  • grade,
  • identifiers.

This avoids retyping product information during every sale.


Quotation

Once quantity is calculated, the system can generate the commercial basis for a quotation.

Conceptually:

Product
×
Required Quantity
×
Price
=
Quotation

Accounting

The second subsystem included accounting functionality for tile and ceramic stores.

The goal was to connect sales transactions to financial records rather than leaving accounting as a separate manual process.


Accounting Scope

A retail accounting workflow can include:

  • customer balance,
  • order amount,
  • payment,
  • outstanding amount,
  • invoice,
  • transaction history.

The exact historical screens should only be described where preserved.


Sales to Delivery

The system aimed to digitize the full commercial lifecycle:

Order Created
    ↓
Confirmed
    ↓
Financial Processing
    ↓
Prepared
    ↓
Delivered

Warehouse Interaction

Even if the historical inventory implementation details are incomplete, the product model naturally connects to inventory.

Each order consumes:

Cartons

and potentially:

Pallets

from available stock.


Product Master Data

The entire system depends on reliable product master data.

A conceptual modern model:

products
├── id
├── manufacturer_id
├── code
├── name
├── type
├── width
├── height
├── grade
├── design
├── color
├── pieces_per_carton
├── coverage_per_carton
├── carton_weight
└── cartons_per_pallet

QR Identity

Each product can be associated with:

product_qr
├── product_id
├── payload
├── version
└── active

QR Versioning

Because standards evolve, a modern implementation should include versioning.

Example:

QR Standard v1
QR Standard v2

This prevents future field changes from breaking old codes.


Canonical Product Schema

A shared retailer standard should define a canonical field structure.

Example:

manufacturer
product_code
product_type
dimensions
grade
design
color
carton_capacity
carton_weight
pallet_capacity

Interoperability

If many retailers use the same standard, the QR data should be independent of one specific shop.

This allows:

Manufacturer / Distributor
          ↓
Canonical QR Data
          ↓
Any Compatible Retailer
          ↓
Same Customer Interpretation

QR Data vs Retailer Data

A robust modern design should distinguish:

Product Standard Data

from:

Retailer-Specific Data

For example:

Standard Product Data

  • size,
  • grade,
  • packaging,
  • product code.

Retailer-Specific Data

  • price,
  • stock,
  • discount,
  • delivery date.

This separation improves reuse.


Public Customer View

The customer-facing interface should emphasize understandable information.

Example:

Company
Type
Size
Design
Color
Grade
Packaging
Coverage

rather than exposing internal database fields.


Retailer View

Retail employees may need more:

Stock
Purchase Cost
Selling Price
Supplier
Warehouse Location
Order History

Role Separation

Modern system roles could include:

Customer
Sales
Warehouse
Accounting
Manager
Administrator

Historical role names should be documented only if preserved.


Customer Role

Can:

  • scan QR,
  • view product information,
  • calculate required quantity.

Sales Role

Can:

  • create customer order,
  • calculate quantity,
  • prepare quotation,
  • check availability.

Warehouse Role

Can:

  • prepare goods,
  • confirm carton/pallet quantities,
  • mark dispatch.

Accounting Role

Can:

  • register payments,
  • confirm financial status,
  • issue accounting records.

Management Role

Can:

  • review sales,
  • review stock,
  • review financial reports,
  • configure product rules.

Inventory Model

For tile and ceramic retail, inventory may be represented at carton level.

Conceptually:

Stock
├── Product
├── Cartons Available
├── Pallets Available
└── Reserved Quantity

Reservation

When an order is confirmed:

Available Stock
      ↓
Reserve Required Cartons
      ↓
Prevent Double-Selling

A modern V2 should implement this transactionally.


Concurrency

If two sales employees sell the same product at the same time, the system should prevent inventory conflicts.

Use:

  • database transactions,
  • row locking,
  • reservation status.

Pricing

A product can have:

  • base price,
  • retailer price,
  • discount,
  • customer-specific price.

The historical pricing rules should be documented only where evidence exists.


Delivery Planning

Pallet calculations can support delivery planning.

Example:

Order
→ 782 Cartons
→ 20 Full Pallets
→ 2 Extra Cartons

This is operationally useful for transport.


Weight Calculation

Because carton weight is known:

Total Shipment Weight
=
Required Cartons × Carton Weight

This can support:

  • vehicle planning,
  • loading,
  • delivery estimation.

Logistics Value

The product standard therefore supports more than customer information.

It can also feed:

Sales
Inventory
Warehouse
Transport

QR Scanning Experience

The mobile screenshots show a dedicated product-information experience after scanning.

This demonstrates a simple and powerful interaction:

Scan
→ Understand
→ Calculate

Why This Matters for End Customers

Construction-material products are often difficult to compare.

A shared standard helps the customer answer:

  • What exactly is this product?
  • What size is it?
  • What grade is it?
  • How much area does one carton cover?
  • How many cartons do I need?
  • How many pallets will that be?

without requiring technical expertise.


Retail Transparency

The standard also improves retail transparency.

A customer can compare products using the same categories instead of relying on inconsistent descriptions.


Data Quality

A shared QR standard is only useful if product data is consistent.

A modern system should validate:

  • dimensions,
  • units,
  • product code,
  • grade,
  • carton coverage,
  • weight,
  • pallet quantity.

Unit Normalization

Important units may include:

cm
m²
kg
piece
carton
pallet

A canonical system should store units explicitly.


Validation Example

If:

80 × 80 cm

then tile area is:

0.64 m²

If a carton contains N pieces:

coverage_per_carton = N × 0.64

The system can validate whether stored coverage is consistent.


Calculation Engine Architecture

A modern implementation should isolate calculation rules from controllers/UI.

Example:

CoverageCalculationService
PackagingCalculationService
PalletCalculationService

Coverage Service

Input:

Product
Target Area

Output:

Required Pieces
Required Cartons
Required Pallets
Remainder

Calculation Result Object

CalculationResult
├── target_area
├── tile_area
├── pieces_required
├── cartons_required
├── full_pallets
└── extra_cartons

Rules Engine Potential

Different products may have different:

  • carton capacities,
  • pallet capacities,
  • packaging rules.

The system should therefore treat them as data-driven rules rather than hard-coded assumptions.


QR Generation

A modern workflow could be:

Product Created
      ↓
Validated
      ↓
QR Payload Generated
      ↓
QR Image Generated
      ↓
Printed / Attached

Label Printing

The physical deployment required QR codes to be printed and attached to products or packaging.

This is an important physical-digital integration point.


Printing Workflow

Product Master
     ↓
QR Generator
     ↓
Label Template
     ↓
Print
     ↓
Attach to Product / Package

Standard Label Layout

A common retailer standard can define:

  • QR placement,
  • human-readable product code,
  • size,
  • grade.

This helps even when scanning is unavailable.


Offline / Generic Scanner Readability

The historical scanner screenshot suggests that product information was designed to remain interpretable through a QR scanning workflow.

A robust standard should avoid making the QR useful only through one proprietary app.


Public Standard Philosophy

The strongest conceptual interpretation is:

The QR code should describe the product, not the retailer.

Retailer-specific functions can be layered on top.

This allows the standard to scale across many stores.


Multi-Retailer Architecture

A modern common platform could support:

Product Standard
      ↓
Retailer A
Retailer B
Retailer C

while each retailer maintains its own:

  • prices,
  • stock,
  • orders,
  • accounting.

Multi-Tenant V2

A modern implementation could be multi-tenant.

Tenant
├── Users
├── Stores
├── Prices
├── Inventory
├── Customers
└── Orders

The shared product master could be centralized.


Shared Master + Retailer Overlay

Shared Product Master
          +
Retailer-Specific Overlay
          ↓
Final Retail View

This is a strong modernization model.


Manufacturer Integration

A future version could allow manufacturers to maintain the canonical product data.

Retailers then consume it.

Manufacturer
     ↓
Product Master
     ↓
Retailers

This reduces inconsistent product descriptions.


Barcode / QR Identifier Strategy

A robust system should use stable unique identifiers.

Avoid encoding mutable data such as current price directly into permanent QR codes.

Use immutable product identity plus controlled data retrieval where appropriate.


Historical vs Modern QR Strategy

The historical project successfully exposed structured product information via QR.

A modern V2 could use:

QR = Stable Product Identifier

and retrieve current data from the platform.

This makes updates easier.


Security

Public QR scanning should expose only public product information.

Internal data such as:

  • purchase cost,
  • accounting data,
  • internal stock details

should remain authenticated.


Public / Internal Boundary

Public QR View
├── Product Specs
├── Packaging
└── Calculator

Internal System
├── Stock
├── Pricing Rules
├── Accounting
└── Orders

Accounting Integration

The commercial subsystem connects operational sales to financial records.

A clean modern flow:

Order
   ↓
Invoice
   ↓
Payment
   ↓
Accounting Transaction

Customer Balance

If credit sales are supported, the system can maintain:

Customer
├── Invoices
├── Payments
└── Balance

Do not claim historical credit-sales logic unless separately documented.


Order Status

A modern V2 could use statuses such as:

Draft
Quoted
Confirmed
Paid / Partially Paid
Prepared
Dispatched
Delivered
Cancelled

These are modernization examples.


Delivery Proof

A future version could record:

  • delivery date,
  • receiver,
  • signature,
  • shipment reference.

Reporting

Useful reports include:

Sales by Product
Sales by Size
Sales by Brand
Cartons Sold
Pallets Shipped
Inventory Remaining

Retail Analytics

Because product attributes are structured, the system can answer questions such as:

Which sizes sell most?
Which grades sell most?
Which manufacturers sell most?
Which products create the largest pallet volume?

Customer Analytics

If privacy rules allow, retailers can analyze:

  • recurring customers,
  • average order area,
  • order frequency.

Standard Adoption Strategy

For a multi-retailer standard, adoption should be gradual.

Conceptually:

Pilot Retailer
     ↓
Validate Fields
     ↓
Validate Customer Understanding
     ↓
More Retailers
     ↓
Common Standard

The historical project had the stated goal of broader Tehran retail use.


Governance of the Standard

A shared standard needs rules for:

  • field definitions,
  • versioning,
  • mandatory fields,
  • optional fields,
  • backward compatibility.

Example Mandatory Fields

Product Code
Manufacturer
Dimensions
Type
Grade
Carton Coverage
Carton Weight
Cartons per Pallet

Optional Fields

Design
Color
Marketing Name
Additional Notes

Standard Versioning Example

TCQR-1.0
TCQR-1.1
TCQR-2.0

This is a suggested modern governance model.


Backward Compatibility

Old printed QR codes may remain in stores for years.

Therefore the decoder should understand older schema versions.


Data Integrity

A QR standard should define:

  • required data types,
  • numeric precision,
  • unit conventions,
  • identifier uniqueness.

Example Validation Rules

width > 0
height > 0
carton_weight > 0
cartons_per_pallet > 0
product_code unique

Historical Evidence Strategy

The currently available images provide strong evidence for:

  1. mobile product detail,
  2. mobile inquiry/calculation form,
  3. QR scan output with technical and packaging information.

Evidence Caption 1 — Product Detail

Customer-facing mobile product detail showing structured information such as company, type, size, design, and color.


Evidence Caption 2 — Inquiry / Calculation

Mobile inquiry interface where a product code and requested area can be submitted for quantity calculation.


Evidence Caption 3 — QR Payload

Historical QR scan showing structured tile/ceramic product specifications, packaging information, and an area-based calculation example.


Historical vs Modern Boundary

Confirmed Historical Capabilities / Facts

  • QR codes were printed and attached to tile/ceramic products.
  • Customers could scan them.
  • Product information included:
    • identity/specifications,
    • dimensions,
    • type,
    • product code,
    • grade,
    • carton capacity,
    • carton weight,
    • pallet placement/capacity.
  • An area-based calculation was provided.
  • A worked calculation example was included.
  • A second subsystem digitized tile/ceramic store sales and accounting.
  • The commercial flow covered customer order through delivery.
  • A common QR information structure was created.
  • The intended rollout was broader use among tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran so ordinary customers could understand specifications consistently.

Modern V2 Recommendations

  • QR schema versioning,
  • multi-tenant retailers,
  • manufacturer-owned product master,
  • API-based product lookup,
  • strict unit normalization,
  • inventory reservation,
  • transactional accounting,
  • modern mobile/web UI,
  • QR identifier instead of mutable embedded data.

What Not to Overclaim

Do not claim:

  • universal adoption by all Tehran retailers unless documented,
  • current mandatory industry-standard status,
  • national adoption,
  • specific accounting features not preserved in evidence,
  • manufacturer integration unless it existed historically.

My Role

A precise portfolio description:

I designed a QR-based product-information model for tile and ceramic products, including technical specifications, packaging data, and area-based quantity calculations, with the goal of creating a consistent customer-facing standard for retailers in Tehran. I also developed a connected sales/accounting workflow that digitized the process from customer order to delivery.


Engineering Highlights

  • Connected physical products to structured digital data via QR.
  • Designed a domain-specific product schema.
  • Modeled dimensions, grades, cartons, weights, and pallets.
  • Implemented area-to-quantity calculation logic.
  • Translated continuous area requirements into discrete packaging quantities.
  • Designed a customer-facing mobile information flow.
  • Connected product data to sales operations.
  • Digitized order-to-delivery workflow.
  • Added accounting-oriented retail processing.
  • Created a reusable product-information standard intended for multi-retailer use.

Business Analysis Highlights

The project demonstrates:

INDUSTRY KNOWLEDGE
→ PRODUCT STANDARD
→ CUSTOMER UX
→ CALCULATION RULES
→ SALES WORKFLOW

This is more than application development.

It is domain modeling.


Standardization Highlights

The intended common structure solved a communication problem.

Before:

Each Shop
→ different terminology
→ different explanation
→ inconsistent customer understanding

After:

Common QR Structure
→ consistent product fields
→ easier customer understanding
→ easier comparison

Career Evidence

This project demonstrates:

  • QR Product Systems
  • Domain Modeling
  • Product Master Data
  • Area / Quantity Calculation
  • Packaging Logic
  • Carton / Pallet Modeling
  • Retail Sales Automation
  • Accounting Workflow
  • Order Fulfillment
  • Physical-to-Digital Integration
  • Industry Standardization
  • Customer-Facing UX

CV Relevance

Tier A — Domain Product Engineering

The project's value comes from combining:

PHYSICAL PRODUCT
+
DIGITAL STANDARD
+
CALCULATION ENGINE
+
RETAIL WORKFLOW

Interview Story

Situation

Tile and ceramic products contain technical and packaging information that ordinary customers often find difficult to interpret consistently across different retailers.

At the same time, sales workflows in tile/ceramic shops could involve separate manual steps from customer request through accounting and delivery.

Task

The project needed to create a standard product-information model that customers could understand directly and also connect product information to the retailer's sales process.

Action

I designed a QR-based product-information structure covering product identity, dimensions, type, grade, carton information, weight, and pallet configuration.

I also implemented area-based calculation logic so the customer could enter the required installation area and receive calculated quantities in tiles/cartons/pallets.

A second subsystem digitized the commercial workflow from customer order through accounting and delivery.

The QR information model was intended to become a common format used across tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran.

Result

The project created a direct connection between:

Physical Product
→ Customer Information
→ Quantity Calculation
→ Sales
→ Fulfillment

and established a reusable foundation for standardized product communication across retailers.


Suggested Website Full Description

Overview

The Tile & Ceramic QR Product Intelligence & Sales Automation Platform combined a customer-facing product-information standard with a retailer operations system.

QR codes attached to physical products allowed customers to access technical and packaging information directly.


Product Standard

The QR model included structured fields such as:

  • company/manufacturer,
  • product type,
  • dimensions,
  • product code,
  • grade,
  • carton capacity,
  • carton weight,
  • pallet configuration.

The objective was to make product specifications understandable and comparable for ordinary customers.


Coverage Calculator

Customers could enter the target installation area.

The system translated this into required product quantities and packaging units.


Retail Standardization

The product-information model was created with broader standardization in mind.

The planned model was for tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran to use the same core information structure.


Sales & Accounting

The second subsystem digitized the store workflow from customer order to final delivery.


Short Website Card Copy

Tile & Ceramic QR Product Intelligence & Sales Automation

Designed a QR-based product-information standard for tile and ceramic retail, including dimensions, grade, carton/pallet logic, and area-based quantity calculation, then connected it to a digital sales/accounting workflow from customer order to delivery.


Alternative One-Liners

QR-oriented

Built a QR-based tile and ceramic product standard that exposed technical, packaging, and quantity-calculation data directly to customers.

Domain-oriented

Modeled tile/ceramic dimensions, grades, cartons, pallet capacity, weight, and area calculations as a reusable digital product standard.

Retail-oriented

Connected QR product intelligence to a full retail sales workflow covering customer order, accounting, preparation, and delivery.

Standardization-oriented

Designed a common QR product-information model intended for use across tile and ceramic retailers in Tehran.


Suggested Website Slug

/projects/tile-ceramic-qr-sales-platform

Alternative:

/projects/qr-tile-product-standard

Cover Direction

Title

Tile & Ceramic QR Product Platform

Subtitle

QR Standard · Area Calculation · Sales Automation

Supporting Line

Product Data · Cartons · Pallets · Accounting · Delivery

Visual Direction

A premium square technical cover should show:

  • ceramic/tile samples,
  • QR code,
  • mobile scan,
  • dimension grid,
  • carton icon,
  • pallet icon,
  • calculator,
  • order workflow.

Primary visual story:

SCAN
→ UNDERSTAND
→ CALCULATE
→ ORDER
→ DELIVER

Avoid making it look like:

  • a generic QR generator,
  • an online tile catalog,
  • a simple calculator.

The core message should be:

standardized product intelligence connected to real retail operations.


Relationship to Other Portfolio Projects

This project fits well beside projects that combine:

  • physical operations,
  • identifiers,
  • business rules,
  • workflow automation.

It is especially valuable because it demonstrates a bridge between the physical retail world and structured software systems.


Modern V2 Architecture

A modern V2 could use:

Frontend
   ↓
Laravel API
   ↓
Product Master
   ├── QR Standard
   ├── Calculation Engine
   ├── Pricing
   ├── Inventory
   └── Orders
        ↓
PostgreSQL

For multiple retailers:

Shared Product Master
          +
Multi-Tenant Retail Layer

Suggested Modules

Products
Manufacturers
QR
Calculation
Retailers
Pricing
Inventory
Customers
Orders
Accounting
Delivery
Reporting

Product Module

Owns:

  • technical specs,
  • dimensions,
  • grade,
  • packaging.

QR Module

Owns:

  • QR generation,
  • schema version,
  • public product representation.

Calculator Module

Owns:

  • area calculation,
  • carton rounding,
  • pallet calculation.

Retail Module

Owns:

  • store-specific pricing,
  • stock,
  • customers.

Sales Module

Owns:

  • quotation,
  • order,
  • payment state.

Delivery Module

Owns:

  • preparation,
  • shipment,
  • final delivery.

Testing Strategy

Product Validation

dimensions valid
coverage valid
packaging valid

Calculator Tests

area → pieces
pieces → cartons
cartons → pallets

QR Tests

encode
scan
decode
schema validation

Order Tests

calculate
reserve
sell
deliver

Example Test

Given:
Tile size = 80 × 80 cm
Carton capacity = N tiles
Pallet capacity = M cartons

When:
Customer requests 1000 m²

Then:
System calculates:
- required tiles
- required cartons
- full pallets
- additional cartons

Data Integrity Principle

The product calculation must always use the same product master that drives the QR information.

This prevents:

QR says one thing
Sales system calculates another

Single Source of Truth

Preferred architecture:

Product Master
    ↓
QR
Calculator
Sales
Inventory

All modules consume the same master data.


Final Portfolio Statement

The strongest way to describe this project is not:

“I built a QR scanner for tiles.”

It is:

I designed a standardized QR-based product-information model for tile and ceramic retail, including technical specifications, packaging intelligence, and area-to-carton/pallet calculations, and connected it to a digital sales/accounting workflow from customer order through delivery.

The project demonstrates how a physical product can become a structured digital object and then drive the entire commercial workflow:

PHYSICAL PRODUCT
→ QR
→ STRUCTURED DATA
→ CUSTOMER UNDERSTANDING
→ QUANTITY CALCULATION
→ ORDER
→ ACCOUNTING
→ DELIVERY